On 12 July, the newspaper El Mundo had the Basque prisoner De Juana Chaos live in San Sebastian just 150 meters from several victims of ETA when leaving the prison the next month of August. The report goes so far as to publish in detail the direction of the floor of De Juana, absolutely unnecessary data from a reporting standpoint. Others in the blogosphere have gone even further: Teleoperador adds its own zip code and even attached a map of the house.
One wonders what might be the motivation behind the publication of such data, and if it is purely and simply to foment some kind of attack (violent or not) against De Juana. It is curious that such acts have consequences, given that another journalist (Pepe Rei) was charged in court for "naming" ETA targets because of a documentary (" Journalists: the business of lying ") that mentioned a number of English journalists without offering data some of them personal.
So do you think someone take action on this issue? Yes Surprisingly (or perhaps not), the Government raises the possibility of taking measures to prevent the former ETA can live near their victims, and that taking into account such a possibility is already covered since 1995 in Article 48 Penal Code. Presumably, the government is considering some sort of special measure intended solely for Basque prisoners. Other unlawful as of the kind we are accustomed, in short.
But this thing is nothing but yet another hypocritical act of a long list that we have been living since De Juana legally fulfilled their jail sentence back in 2005, and began when De Juana was charged (and subsequently convicted ) for a crime of "threats" because of two articles published in the newspaper Gara and in fact did not contain any threats. However, the far-right leader Saenz de Ynestrillas who threatened to kill himself De Juana himself in full view no such act had no legal consequence for him.
From this new conviction for "threats" (practically a crime of opinion), would the rest of the story already known: the prisoner's hunger strike and subsequent force-feeding ( practice described as "torture" by the UN itself, as much as Amnesty International use double standards in this case), transfer to the Basque Country and back away (just next day to give ETA end the cease-fire, etc.).
This framed, of course, within the general hypocrisy with which it is itself the Basque conflict in Spain. Because all those who cry out against De Juana prison claiming that 20-year sentence for his murder are insufficient, both cry out against certain characters just as murderers (maybe more) and yet have not met any convictions since have not even been tried (in many cases have important political office without anyone taking their hands to the head). Nor do they shocked too that other murderers live near their victims' families, as often happens in many English towns without Pedro J. Ramirez publish anything about it.
One wonders what might be the motivation behind the publication of such data, and if it is purely and simply to foment some kind of attack (violent or not) against De Juana. It is curious that such acts have consequences, given that another journalist (Pepe Rei) was charged in court for "naming" ETA targets because of a documentary (" Journalists: the business of lying ") that mentioned a number of English journalists without offering data some of them personal.
So do you think someone take action on this issue? Yes Surprisingly (or perhaps not), the Government raises the possibility of taking measures to prevent the former ETA can live near their victims, and that taking into account such a possibility is already covered since 1995 in Article 48 Penal Code. Presumably, the government is considering some sort of special measure intended solely for Basque prisoners. Other unlawful as of the kind we are accustomed, in short.
But this thing is nothing but yet another hypocritical act of a long list that we have been living since De Juana legally fulfilled their jail sentence back in 2005, and began when De Juana was charged (and subsequently convicted ) for a crime of "threats" because of two articles published in the newspaper Gara and in fact did not contain any threats. However, the far-right leader Saenz de Ynestrillas who threatened to kill himself De Juana himself in full view no such act had no legal consequence for him.
From this new conviction for "threats" (practically a crime of opinion), would the rest of the story already known: the prisoner's hunger strike and subsequent force-feeding ( practice described as "torture" by the UN itself, as much as Amnesty International use double standards in this case), transfer to the Basque Country and back away (just next day to give ETA end the cease-fire, etc.).
This framed, of course, within the general hypocrisy with which it is itself the Basque conflict in Spain. Because all those who cry out against De Juana prison claiming that 20-year sentence for his murder are insufficient, both cry out against certain characters just as murderers (maybe more) and yet have not met any convictions since have not even been tried (in many cases have important political office without anyone taking their hands to the head). Nor do they shocked too that other murderers live near their victims' families, as often happens in many English towns without Pedro J. Ramirez publish anything about it.
