Bollywood Actresses Boobs

On 16 February, the daily El Pais published an interview the new General Coordinator of Izquierda Unida, Cayo Lara. For answers we noticed some improvement, in every sense, with the level of the previous coordinator, Gaspar Llamazares. Throughout the interview we can see some aspect of the left who stumbles, however, two important points: the Basque conflict and the Cuban Revolution.

on the Basque conflict, and more specifically on the Law of Parties:

P. Are you happy or upset that the Supreme Court has annulled the lists and Askatasuna D3M?

R. do not agree with the banning, is extremely dangerous outlaw people for failing to condemn ETA. Outlaw "who have not condemned the invasion of Gaza? To those who supported the invasion of Iraq? It's just a question that I leave in the air. Is that the proscription is very dangerous. It does not help to solve the Basque problem: create martyrs.

Cayo Lara realizes that outlaw parties is not "dangerous" but undemocratic. He seems simply "Dangerous" because it is concerned that the party is outlawed or Askatasuna D3M, the danger for him is that outlaw who should not be outlawed: PP, PSOE, IU ... But it is concerned that outlawing certain policy options that it believes can be outlawed without problems, as in the case of Basque independence. Another disadvantage

Cayo see Lara in the banning is the creation of "martyrs" from the nationalist left. In other words: not considered negative proscription in itself, but of course the political exploitation of this could make the nationalist left. Needless to say, he is the very left-wing nationalism that wants to be outlawed, and the head its autoilegalización.

then says:

P. Is not dangerous to have in the institutions to parties that support ETA?

R. Concern that there are more indifferent. If ETA parties serve, we must ensure that citizens do not vote. The theme of the Basque Country as a massive cover smokescreen Spain's social problems.

assumes that there may be "parties that serve ETA", forgetting perhaps that in any case, ETA will work with certain individuals in that game and that existing laws that punish "collaborating with armed groups." It is impossible for a political party commits a crime of collaboration with ETA but not specifically accuse any member of the same. Let

now with another obstacle facing the Cayo Lara:

Question. Why United Left advocates the dictatorship in Cuba?

Response. Well, there is a concept of dictatorship ... It is a model that Cubans have a revolution after 50 years. The Cubans are the ones to decide which model they want.

P. How democratic elections or what?

R. They have elections, only with a single party. Cuba Yo I stay with this: is a country, impoverished by the blockade, was capable of transmitting more solidarity than many developed European countries: teachers, doctors sent to other countries to treat people ... A Cuba must be assessed by comparison with neighboring countries, not Sweden. And, compared with its surroundings, Cuba has given lessons to the world. They have to make your transition: with Fidel, without Fidel, Raul, not Raul, but they are the ones who will decide.

first thing that strikes us in this response is that Mr. Lara does not deny the existence of a dictatorship in Cuba. Not correct the misinformation of the interviewer, only to mumble pathetically limited: "There is a concept of dictatorship ..." And his words one can deduce the absurd idea that the Cuban people have voluntarily opted to acquire a dictatorial political system.

To top it off, goes on to say that "they have elections, only one-party," as if he were to run for election or had anything to do with the electoral process. For Lara, the Cuban elections are not very different from those held in Spain under Franco.

I think the posture of a man allegedly socialist positions with two major issues such as conflict Basque and the Cuban revolution is revealing enough on their policy thinking.