Sebastiano Ricci (1659-1734). Art Allegory Talking of art and is always seeking to define the initiation of one of the most heated controversies that may be established, not only by the passion with which scholars can begin their partners and maintain the same, but nature it brings them together to discuss. The art, not being a science-as-literature left by those seeking to grab least give a conceptualization (now that I think, even today science itself reaches a fixed conceptualization and imperishable as that sought for it in the shelters of Modernity). However, the art has a cultural politics of its own thanks to the hands and the talent of thousands of men and women around the world who continue to work for him and for him and do as they have reached the right words to approach a definition of what is his work: art.
Currently the number of arts has increased, leaving from a small group of only 05 of them (architecture, sculpture, painting, music and architecture) but the same, with the emergence of new communication technologies and the design has been reinvented and fused, to be able to set new arts , arts even more artificial than those already known, and absolutely all (though some more than others) struggling to keep from being recognized as such. Getting a college or institute of scholarly criticism of the ends to devote themselves as such, as superior, precisely because all around them has been established around a critical study and institutionalized the same as those outlined as vital components culture today. When not talking about any of them because they simply do not exist or is not worth to talk about them. Today hardly stop talking about what a man produces and called art. So what is art?
I only say this time that if there is anything I can define art is its ability to allow the person who works for him to express all that world which contains in its interior, in his soul, his mind, and motivates him to say things he feels and how he sees the world, life, interaction with people and how to read yourself. Producing art is not an easy task, however. I can not know enough to paint or compose a musical page to say that I make art, or to pretend that this will call me an artist. The art involves reading and re-reading of all that can be read and understood through what the artist produces, and which in turn can allow others, with the reading of it-at least feel "moved "with the message you are trying to convey, receptive, assimilate and reproduce, taking the message of the living words of the artist and his relentless battle with the search for values \u200b\u200blike truth, goodness and beauty. Making art as what is known is also a way of philosophizing, to ask for the whole and to communicate the responses generated by questioning the whole.
The art of art production demands perseverance, patience and dedication to the pursuit of that for which we seek an answer. It is not about making art by making art, because perhaps the rsultado of such work does not necessarily produce it (indeed, I do not think so). The artist who does not struggle to find answers to your questions is because they simply do not raise questions, and then it is only a mere player forms called aesthetic and pleasing to the senses. The artist, like the philosopher or social thinker is never happy with what he says about the world, life, people and himself. Need to overcome that sort of illusion of transparency that rust reality, space, and to do tricks to see that everything is already said and understand why things are understood. The skeptical spirit dominates, and reflects on his surroundings, which implies an art of thinking about art. A commitment from the art that requires the art of compromise that is definitely not many have, or that some are less developed than others.
I am convinced that part of the artist's role is to communicate his thoughts, to transmit the answers to your questions about the world of life, and to disseminate them because, to get better view of everything-is generous and gives mere mortals the tools to see the same thing he sees, or to even ask the same questions he does, and whose answers works through his work. However, there is a kind of convention between the artists for which these reserve the right to refuse admission of mere mortals to the world of production of meanings and signifiers, confining his work to places like the museums that do not communicate with best achieved languages \u200b\u200bfindings. In this way, the museum becomes an esoteric space How so?
The mere mortal who visits a museum (and does so with the best of intentions) may not know that there are, it is difficult access to the meanings of the works on display, but could earn him a desire to learn (as indeed it is worth). If he has not been nurtured why art in a museum for example, finds no opportunity to do so? Should it turn back on your site and leave the museum due to an academy of higher education to study art and access to everything the museum contain? The art made in many cases do not say what the artist was to create art, and the best use a difficult language and abstract. It is difficult to talk always gives a kind of elite brand, kind of card that the other members of your elite I ask you, friend, artist, for follow belong to the club. Why, if the contents of those works are of value (from this premise), I as a mere mortal I have the opportunity to access them? My ignorance and lack of educational opportunities should condemn and not to resign for ever so many knowledge access, contents and meanings that can "read" would make it worth my life, so to speak?
Okay, I have the skills to access, but do not be part of the role of the artist to teach about art while trying to produce? "Necessarily the artist has to renege on the pedagogy and exposing arrogant a work that only his fellow scholars entienen? Why do it? How to get the palms of these? Does the artist would allow me, mere mortal, do not access the contents of value expressed in his work, content that would make my life becomes more free of bias and squared readings at all, broader vision of the world , life, people and about myself? Access to this content could be reconciled with all of them, reconociliarme myself. Even so, the artist would consent to lose all this simply out of vanity and condemn me to be hopelessly ignorant for being ignorant?
The
art lessons go hand in hand with the art of teaching, and in this sense the artist can be a social partner from his post set of work contributes to the world people have less dominated not only by states, markets and money, but also dominated by the ghosts of their fears and sobreexpectativas, steps and walked no invisible paths never be crossed desired. If art is understood and disseminated and more people from the opacity of their lives, seek, and understanding the art in this way, the artist could sleep even more pleasure in the warmth of his studio served one night sleeping at dawn which until later it was working ... And all, all for art.
0 comments:
Post a Comment