29 Weeks Pregnant And Stools Are Black

left senseless crime

- Win PP and PSOE, both in number of votes into seats (both win 5 more). A new step, then, to American-style bipartisanship.

- collapses IU (passed 5 to 2 seats), probably due to the mismanagement of Llamazares, without discarding of all the excuses he has presented it: the electoral law, the useful vote and bipartisan trend. In any case lost its parliamentary group, about what will happen to the Joint Group as any residual force.

- ERC collapses (from 8 to 3 seats). Do not forget that the excellent results he achieved in 2004 were due mainly to the fierce campaign Carod-Rovira suffered at that time by the right because of his meeting with ETA.

- Right Catalonia (CiU) won one seat (with a total of 11) and it probably rests on the PSOE during this term, given the good results that have given money to the "center."

- The PNV loses more than 100,000 voters and a seat, having been overtaken as largest party in Euskadi in favor of the PSOE, for the first time in its history. "It promises that a future conquest of the Basque territory PPSOE? More than one-independence is shaking with fear at the possibility.

- EA loses his seat and disappears Congress. It will be difficult to return to it.

- Canary Coalition lost a seat and gets 2.

- BNG Nafarroa Bai and manage to keep their seat each.

- New: Rosa Díez's party won seats, so unfortunately continue charging the public treasury.

- My personal choice has not reached the 300,000 votes and has declined compared to 2004.

- The inactivity of the state is more or less the same as 2004 but has increased in Euskal Herria Hego to reach eight points. The leftwing nationalist campaign in favor of abstention has taken effect, but only among regular voters. Would there have been more abstention in the absence of the ETA attack last day of campaigning? In any case not benefited.

The conclusions are obvious: out very detrimental to the multiparty system in favor of PP and PSOE. The shift to right center that will take both parties is evident. On the other hand, the parliamentary left collapses down to almost nothing, while there are new right-wing forces as UPyD.

Anyway, now more than ever have won as usual, while others have lost.

Where Can I Buy Fabric To Make Fluffies

I think we can draw some conclusions about the latest attack by ETA:

1) ETA has carried out an attack easier and convenient: a person without an escort and in a town like Mondragon, where I suppose that the organization will have significant support. I conclude therefore that ETA wanted by all means do not fail on this occasion.

2) It seems clear that an attack carried out two days before the election is intended to influence them. The question is whether this will eventually influence and in which direction. For now, I fear that no such attack had been less participation (by that of "ETA wants to not vote, so voted all over the world" or by statements Carrasco's daughter calling for participation), for what gives paradox that the killing undermines the strategy of abstaining from the nationalist left. High participation also benefits the PSOE, with the risk that Zapatero reach an absolute majority and reach a clear conclusion: that the Basques stick up for the polls, because even the responses of ETA at the same benefit you.

3) Isaias Carrasco was not an elected official, but a former elected official. It appears that ETA opens a new front (another): the former elected officials. The next step will be to imagine that the rank and simple, and I think this step will prove to be targets of ETA even mere voters, thereby giving the reason that the manipulators Euskadi ensure that there is a fear vote. On the other hand, I think that ETA's supporters are more sympathetic to its stock when the murder in question is a member of the ESF or a politician who has anything to do with state repression. I guess one more will have been hand-to-head to see that this time the crime has been directed against a person who already had nothing to do with the apparatus of state repression (if they ever had something to do that is enough), so that social support ETA is today somewhat less than yesterday.

Conclusion: I believe that this murder was senseless even from the cold point of view of political tactics. This is what has let the military conduct policy analysis.

Xilisoft Dvd Creator 6 License

more useful Voting Article 19

politically responsible Everyone has a duty to consider its position regarding the forthcoming general election, against which the radical left has few alternatives to be analyzed rationally and calmly. The

at first sight could be the most obvious is precisely what discard before: vote for the PSOE. Nobody who actually see on the left can help to establish a government that has been characterized by its position in international politics quite fascist (active collaboration with the occupation of Afghanistan and Lebanon, complicit with Israeli and American terrorism, confrontation with Venezuela, etc..) and with respect to the Basque conflict (negotiation-trap, outlawed, mass arrests of political leaders, torture ...), or his cowardice with dyes accomplices in other national issues: the economy, church-state relationship, etc. Some tentative progress in certain social rights (gay marriage law) do not compensate at all the above.

Another option would be to vote in another force on the left, for example UI. Obviously this is a far more left-wing party the PSOE, but not enough, or at least not enough to stop paying his support and contributions to it. It is true that both IU and ERC have had a key pressure for the government of Zapatero derechizase no further, but the conclusion remains the same: it does not offset the full support and complicity that have provided the PSOE.

And the latter is true for left-wing parties as IU as nationalist parties PNV and CiU as: votándoles guarantee the parliamentary support and complicity of the "consensus" that needs Zapatero.

But if we discard the parliamentary parties ... Who do vote then? We can forget any kind of pragmatism and choose to offer our support to innumerable (and often wacky) minority parties also submitted to the elections, it will not be very different to throw away the ballot next: do not get any representation (d'Hondt law and the provincial district and are responsible it) and our votes will be included within the limited category of "other", so will not help.

We only have, therefore, two proposals: one abstention and blank votes, and both are excellent in showing our disagreement and our contempt for this "democracy" glue. The leftwing nationalist campaign is conducted in the Basque Country abstention, for example, is a magnificent example of demonstration of protest against the system and the government to suffer. Predictably, the abstention orchestrated hundreds of thousands of people will be a real blow to democracy that called rigging.

However, to join this campaign in other parts of the state is an error. If someone wants to do a show similar to the nationalist and declines, will likely be added to all that passive abstention composed of citizens politically unconscious, among other reasons because there is no campaign to call the locals, like myself, the abstention. Thus, the protest vote would remain in nothing.

My conclusion therefore is that if we make a show of contempt for this system cuasifascista is no other recourse than white vote, which hopefully will be posted along with the rest of blank ballots as an expression of protest dissidents in the country, ensuring not to be confused with passivity or any political passivity.

I also can say that I consider the forthcoming elections in terms of "useful vote." In fact, I think my vote is going to be the most useful of all.