Knightsbridge Collectionred

shoes pinch me Latin American leaders were in favor and against attack on Libya

For

Bogotá Agencia EFE, March 20 (EFE) .- The Latin American leaders today took sides with and against military intervention in Libya, on a day which according to the international coalition, has already managed to impose an air exclusion zone in the North African country.

international military intervention to protect the Libyan population began on Saturday, as representatives agreed from 22 countries who met yesterday in Paris to define the measures to implement Resolution 1937 of the Security Council of the UN.

In this regard, U.S. forces, France and Britain launched air strikes against the Libyan air defense systems also established combat air patrols over Benghazi for troops loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi no march on the rebel stronghold in the east of the country.

Brazil, which was one of the five members of the UN Security abstained from voting on resolution 1973, which creates an air exclusion zone in Libya, has not commented on the start military operations, which coincided with a visit to Brasilia for U.S. President Barack Obama.

"Today I have authorized the U.S. military to launch a limited action against Libya," said Obama, after his meeting with Lula, Dilma Rousseff.

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who had proposed to create a peaceful international commission to help resolve the internal conflict in Libya and had the support of Gaddafi today called for a cessation of "aggression", the they labeled as an "imperial madness."

At the time, Venezuela's Foreign Minister Nicolas Maduro said that what happened will unleash "a war situation in the Mediterranean with unimaginable consequences."

In its findings as endorsed by the Cuban president Fidel Castro, who considered that the "power" of NATO military and "stupid" because it "would not be used or can be used. Just goes to show the waste and chaos engendered by capitalism. "

also challenges the existence of the Security Council and "The veto, antiveto, majority, minority, abstention, speeches, demagoguery and the solemn allegations of (the UN Secretary General) Ban Ki-moon."

Similarly, the president of Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega criticized United Nations to become "an instrument of those powers in the service of war, death," adding that "now is a foreign war (against Libya) looking for ways to grab the oil" because "democracy is bullshit ".

This was supported by the Argentine Foreign Minister, Hector Timerman, questioning the attack has been resolved by the Security Council without a comprehensive debate by the UN General Assembly, which he added, "shows that there to modify the power of veto. "

Similarly, the Bolivian president, Evo Morales, who reiterated his "conviction, condemnation and rejection" of the intervention, she clarified that if not accepted "Which violate human rights in Libya" and therefore must be investigated and punished "those who did, the" powers "should not take this situation for a military intervention.

From Ecuador, the Foreign Ministry said that "it is unacceptable" what happened, as the "intrusion unfortunately promotes the escalation of violence."

said in a statement that the Andean nation has always advocated peace and the settlement of disputes peacefully, "as he said, the attack does not contribute to the output of the most even though the same groups claiming the Libyan government has asked the West not to have intervention forces foreign country. "

Fernando Lugo, meanwhile, said that Paraguay" any kind of violence is justifiable, "lamented the UN authorization for the use of force and declared the hope that" rationality wisdom, fairness and above all the principle of self determination of peoples, who are masters of their own processes, can be respected. "

The Uruguayan President José Mujica, said the attacks were" deplorable "and" just want to mourn "because" saving lives is a contradiction unexplained bombings.

On the contrary, which itself was in favor of the intervention was the Colombian Juan Manuel Santos arguing that the regime of Libya "has made a mockery" of UN resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in that country.

Colombia, which is currently non-permanent member of the Security Council, "will always support the positions they defend freedom and democracy," stressed the head of state.

The decision also found support in the Government of Chile, whose Foreign Ministry deplored the "armed actions implemented by the Libyan Government" against "his own people" and expressed hope for an end to violence.

Similarly, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Mexico requested the Libyan authorities "to immediately halt gross and massive violations of human rights of civilians" and called for further work in coordination with the Arab League and African Union, to the role and their voices are fully taken into account. In

head of his ruling, Alan Garcia, Peru, the first country to break diplomatic relations with Libya after Gaddafi launched air strikes on claiming his removal from power, welcomed the intervention.

The president said that "we are showing that international law is fundamental to the coexistence of peoples and defend human rights" and considered "Has been successful," and we'll see "how soon the situation will change in favor of democracy."

Finally, the Salvadoran Church, in the voice of the Archbishop of San Salvador, José Luis Escobar Alas, expressed concern about civilian casualties and called the conflict is resolved in the best way so they can "live in peace and freedom ".

How To Make Your Own Wrestling Figures Stage

What changes in the foreign policy of the United States? Student Organizations Chile

Inter-American relations, Security Shield and Sword of the New World of the projection of U.S. global power.

"The Monroe Doctrine represents the interests of the whole continent, and all states of America have agreed to maintain it. Moreover, although so far the U.S. has been his only defender, currently Latin states would be found powerful enough to keep it if the United States refused to do so. "
Document Taken Santa Fe, devoted to Latin America and the Caribbean Basin.

What changes in the foreign policy of the United States?
S
i salamero we adhere to the statements of the leadership of the FMLN political party, would be swallowed without water, the vicious lie launched by them, trying to make us believe that the United States "have changed and evolved in its external relations" . Why this dome dare to make such statements? What is behind such a lie that neither the same right is capable of sustaining? An ass so big and so cynical no one believes anyone, let alone the hawks and foxes in the Pentagon and State Department in the U.S..

These leaders seem unaware that a position so Salamero and "enrollona" far from being respected, earns the distrust and even despise them for their compliments are addressed. True, they no longer find where to put the knees, but it is also true that some credit and some respect if they could enjoy at least a minimum position of principle. They may even benefit from a reasonable doubt. Nobody

betray a cause or betray itself can be credible. The distrust is always present, even those who are served. In ancient Rome, as a rule, the pro-consuls used to say: "Rome pays the traitors, but also despises them."

All these movements and plaintive cries of forgiveness in purgatory, are given on the eve of the visit of U.S. President, Barak Obama, the country. Is it required so much shame, so displays of appeasement and adulation? Is not a political statement reasoned enough without her necessarily confrontational or offensive to the visitor? It may be politically correct but this is a sign of appeasement vilest. But trying to hide with flattery and lies outside the invariable policy of the United States on this continent and the world, is something that does not believe anyone in the country, and she believes it's own visitors and those who accompany him them, we do know what they are!

express in unison, as they have done the members of the dome and its officials, U.S. government policy has changed, it's just a late claim to be believed and forgiven. No one or very few, with a "hearts" of intelligence in your head, you can rely on a leadership lost and tangled in tactical games which, far from building a coherent and credible progress each day toward the dam and accommodation all without a qualm.
.

S i foreign policy of the United States has changed, then explain how members of the FMLN leadership that the criminal embargo against Cuba to be maintained? How

FMLN leaders could justify the continued torturing even children of 15 years (Omar Khadr) in the prison of the U.S. military base in Guantanamo Bay, even under the current administration of Barak Obama?

substantiate the harassment against the government of President Chavez and the ALBA Project? The attempted coup against President Rafael Correa, and the effective coup d'etat against the legitimate government of President Zelaya in Honduras is also another "change" for the dome?

How to explain the increase of troops in Afghanistan and the deaths of thousands of civilians, or of using Colombia as a gigantic military base?

And what about the probable invasion of Libya, on which in the final minutes of Saturday March 20, 2010, more than one hundred Tomahawk cruise missiles have been launched, imperial aggression driven by the takeover of the gas fields, oil and aquifers in the country?

These are the changes in American foreign policy that sees the FMLN leadership, welcomes and applauds? Certainly here the only "changed" they, the leaders of the FMLN. The U.S. remained invariably unchanged!

Funes and his frustrated desire to show Obama with a nice family photograph.

A three days of arrival in the country of President Barak Obama, nothing suggests that the visitor will find the much sought after "Government of National Unity," which, if properly observed, would be a corrected version and increased from the first with which Funes has tried to greet Obama. Any attempt to bring to the table for consultation with the private sector, represented in some way ARENA has met with strong opposition and conditioning it, which keeps getting more and more demanding in terms of participants in the Consultative Council.

non-participation of the other guests, although Funes was prepared after a meeting with the other three ex-presidents, took place without his presence. This second meeting of the Council, then, if you can still call and was developed with the same participants of the first and without the presence of the press, even when it was announced that those meetings would be public. In the second session, nothing has transpired to the public: it seems that passed unnoticed, and who knows if it would only be A meeting of wailing and scratching his head. It seems that this really is at stake tactical political and economic right, and a tactical game well thought out, calculated and very likely effective! We'll see the results after the visitor has left. There is no doubt that there will be private meeting between Obama and some individuals from the ANEP, or at least, you will get their demands in a document.

So far, it has become clear is that all attempts to Funes, seeking a reconciliation with ANEP and ARENA, have failed. Of all the prayers have been used for presidential speeches honeyed and mixed with pride that the ENADE do . There was a mix of interests absurd to say that "no divorce ireconciliable between workers and employers".

And who has told Funes the exploited and the exploiters some days married? To say this is a total ignorance of the real conflict of Salvadoran society divided into classes. In the history of humanity has never been on an equal footing with the slave master or the servant to the Lord, nor the proletariat with the bourgeoisie. Never in these stages of human development has been a marriage between them. Al Rather, they are class differences and antagonistic and irreconcilable interests lies the genesis of the conflict.

L a single most telling part of his speech, its content, was the message to employers, who started applause. This occurred when Funes said: "There will be packages of tax, or paquetazos while the fiscal pact is not treated in the Social Economic Council." Let me tell you, let me stress once again that I have no tax increase proposed in my desktop. I have not, nor I have asked any staff, "said Funes to employers and special guests Enade 2011. Was there any reason why the powerful to not applaud?

Finally, what is Obama country?. A visit to a "partner", or inspect a property? For a lot of saliva to be spent by stating that "the deal is as equals and respect each other" as the Chancellor said Hugo Martinez, one fact is clear: this is his backyard when he is reviewing .

These veins are still open in Latin America. As Eduardo Galeano say, "they continue to bleed and waiting to be closed!".

By Salvador Arias
(other)

Multiplication Table Chart

reject Obama visit

Chile

student organizations reject Obama visit

Santiago de Chile, Mar 19 (Prensa Latina) Chile student organizations reiterated their commitment to progress of protest tomorrow in the capital against the country visit of U.S. President Barack Obama. president of the Federation of Students of the University of Chile, Camila Vallejo, called to repudiate the presence of U.S. president and said he is far to honor the Nobel Peace Prize he received in 2009. Vallejo denounced Washington's war policy regarding the Middle East, and likewise also ruled the Chilean university leader Germain Quintana, who urged Obama to renounce the idea of \u200b\u200bmilitary intervention in Libya. Chilean university students will join the demonstration will start from the Plaza Italia in Santiago to the central Plaza de Armas, which is hosting a rally in opposition to Obama's visit, organized by the College of Teachers, the Communist Party, groups that defend human rights and Chilean Movement of Solidarity with Cuba. The rally called for peace and against war will be the central objective of repudiation of U.S. meddling proceed, including assaults against the governments of Cuba, Ecuador, Bolivia, Nicaragua and Venezuela. In Concepcion, capital of the Bío Bío region, there is also another demonstration against the imperial policies representing and supports Obama. addition to the practices of the White House warmongers, the organizers of the protest in Concepcion criticized the nuclear agreement signed Friday between Chile and the United States, which considered completely indefensible given the high seismicity of the South American country. The inclusion of Chile on the tour, country from which Obama will deliver a speech on Monday aimed at Latin America, highlights the complacency of Washington with the policies promoted by the government of Sebastián Piñera. Obama in Chile will feel at home, he said sarcastically local magazine Punto Final. "Our country is a crude imitation their own, "said the publication.